**

The highly anticipated Air India probe report into the near-miss collision between two Air India planes at Mumbai airport in January 2023 has sparked intense debate within the aviation community. While the official investigation is still ongoing, a leading aviation expert, Captain Amit Sharma (name changed to protect identity), has released a preliminary analysis, controversially ruling out pilot error and instead pointing the finger squarely at potential Boeing 777 design flaws and possibly system failures. This has ignited a firestorm of discussion surrounding Air India safety, Boeing 777 safety, and near-miss aviation accidents.

The Mumbai Near-Miss: A Recap

On January 11th, 2023, two Air India Boeing 777 aircraft had a dangerously close call on the taxiway at Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport. The incident, captured on CCTV footage that quickly went viral, showed a near-collision that highlighted serious lapses in air traffic control and potentially more significant underlying issues. The close call triggered a comprehensive investigation by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), prompting nationwide scrutiny of Air India flight safety procedures and broader concerns about aviation safety in India.

Captain Sharma's Controversial Analysis: Boeing 777 System Failures?

Captain Sharma, a veteran pilot with decades of experience and a renowned aviation safety expert, has released his independent assessment, challenging the initial assumptions surrounding the incident. His analysis suggests the primary contributing factor was not pilot error, as many initially speculated. Instead, he points to potential flaws within the Boeing 777's systems, particularly focusing on:

Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) Discrepancies:

• Possible GPWS Failure: Captain Sharma suggests that a malfunction or delayed activation of the GPWS, a crucial system designed to warn pilots of imminent ground collisions, could have played a significant role in the near-miss. He notes that the investigation needs to thoroughly examine the aircraft's GPWS logs for any anomalies or discrepancies. This is a critical point, as a faulty GPWS alert system could have dramatically reduced pilot awareness of the impending danger.
• Insufficient Alert Clarity: Even if the GPWS functioned correctly, Captain Sharma raises concerns about the clarity and urgency of the warnings, arguing that they might not have been sufficient to alert the pilots to the immediate and critical situation. This highlights the need for stricter guidelines regarding aviation safety alerts and their effective communication to pilots.

Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) and Communication Breakdown:

While Captain Sharma refutes primary pilot error, he doesn't entirely absolve the pilots. His analysis highlights potential issues related to cockpit resource management and communication.

• Lack of Communication: The incident suggests a lack of sufficient communication between the two pilots, and possibly between the pilots and air traffic control. Effective pilot-ATC communication is paramount for safety, and any breakdown in this vital link should be carefully reviewed.
• CRM Deficiencies: He also mentions potential deficiencies in cockpit resource management, which encompasses the crew's ability to work together effectively under pressure. This aspect demands closer examination within the ongoing official investigation.

The Boeing 777's Design and Technology:

Captain Sharma's most controversial assertion is the possibility of underlying design flaws in the Boeing 777 itself, contributing to the near-miss. He suggests that further investigation should examine:

• Taxiway Guidance Systems: He calls for a review of the effectiveness and clarity of the taxiway guidance systems available to pilots on Boeing 777 aircraft, suggesting potential improvements or upgrades to prevent similar incidents in the future.
• Automation Reliance: The analysis touches upon the potential over-reliance on automation systems, which might have led to a delayed response to the critical situation. This underscores the need for continuous training on manual flight control and minimizing over-dependence on automated systems.

The Ongoing DGCA Investigation and the Aviation Industry's Response

The DGCA is still conducting its comprehensive investigation, interviewing pilots, reviewing flight data recorders, and assessing air traffic control protocols. Their findings are expected to shed more light on the sequence of events, but Captain Sharma’s report adds another layer of complexity to the already intricate investigation. The aviation industry is closely watching this case, with many industry experts expressing concern about the implications of this near-miss.

This incident has raised significant questions about Air India pilot training, Air India maintenance procedures, and the overall safety standards within Indian aviation. The outcome of the official investigation will likely have profound implications for the future of aviation safety regulations in India and potentially impact other airlines operating Boeing 777 aircraft globally.

Conclusion: The Need for Comprehensive Safety Improvements

Regardless of the official findings, the near-miss incident at Mumbai airport serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers within the aviation industry. Captain Sharma's report highlights the need for a comprehensive review of not only pilot training and air traffic control procedures but also the design and functionality of aircraft systems themselves. Preventing future incidents necessitates a multifaceted approach, encompassing improved communication protocols, rigorous maintenance checks, and a deep dive into potential design flaws in aircraft technology. The emphasis should be on proactive safety improvements rather than reactive measures following such alarming near-miss incidents. The aviation community awaits the final DGCA report with bated breath, hoping it leads to meaningful and lasting changes that enhance aviation safety worldwide.